How local does a local have to be?

Posted by on Apr 18, 2013 in Pubs | 2 Comments

Norm4

A few days after you read this, I am set to move across this blustery, malt-scented city, from one side to the other. The distance isn’t that great, as the crow flies – Edinburgh being such a compact capital – so hopefully it shouldn’t take too long to trundle our possessions from old A to new B. As ever with moving, there are pros and cons involved. One of the major positives, for me, is that I will be less than a quarter of a mile from one of the best pubs in the city. Great beer, all of 350yds away (a four-minute walk, according to Google Maps). In summary, I will shortly have a new local.

As a concept, ‘the local’ is enshrined in British culture (and beyond, of course, as Norm knew only too well). A place where you can feel as comfortable as possible, second only to sitting slumped on your sofa at home. Traditionally, the local was just that – the pub at the end of the road or round the corner. The drinking destination that was the easiest to scuttle to, and weave your way home from. These days, though, has that concept changed slightly? Does ‘the local’ no longer have to be the pub most local to you? Is it more a state of mind, based on your ‘favourite’ boozer?

My old man, for instance, very much has a local – the City Arms, in Manchester. Thing is, he lives over thirty miles away, and has to make special trips there once a month or so. In fact, he goes there more regularly than any of the pubs where he lives. To him, clearly, the ‘where it is versus how it makes me feel’ co-efficient is firmly stacked towards the latter end of the scale. I suppose how far you are willing to go to get to your local depends on the level of comfort and familiarity you’re seeking. Maybe I’m just supremely lucky that the nearest watering hole to me (as of next week) happens to meet all of my criteria.

As it is, most of us are willing to indulge in a bit of a journey to get to our favoured pub of choice – possibly bypassing others that are nearer in the process. How far are you willing to go to find your local – is distance no object? Or is it simply the closest non-leaky building that possesses an alcohol licence? And what’s the sliding scale of acceptability – will you walk an extra ten minutes for three more cask taps? Fifteen for artisan nuts? Maybe, like the Queen’s birthday, the best idea is to have two – a ‘Geographic local’ (for necessary, mid-week, taking-the-edge-off drinking) and a ‘State of Mind local’ (for relaxed, familiar, trouble-free pintage and cheerful banter)…

2 Comments

  1. tania_nexust
    April 18, 2013

    I am definitely in the ‘state of mind’ camp – for the past few years I’ve considered my ‘local’ to be the Bartons Arms – although getting there from home involves an hour’s journey across Birmingham on two different buses. But it’s the pub where I feel most at home; where I go to celebrate good times or cheer me up and calm me down in sad times; where I will always have a friendly welcome and chat with the bar managers & staff; where I can settle into “Regulars’ Corner” to catch up with familiar faces; where I spend hours at a time every time I visit; a pub I’d battle through blazing heat and blizzards to get to, knowing it’s worth the effort.

    Doesn’t stop me moaning though that I’d love there to be a decent ‘local’ pub to where I live – i.e. walking distance for those summer evenings or Sunday afternoons where you wouldn’t mind popping out for a pint but hadn’t planned to go far, but the only decent options involve bus fares, time, and more effort than drinking something from the beer stash at home!

  2. Ewan
    April 19, 2013

    I have a pub about 50 metres (maybe even less!) from my door. But I’d still rather get on the train and travel for an hour to get to Edinburgh where the choice of ‘Locals’ is abundant.
    Sadly I feel, the local Local, is not interested in providing a tasty range of beers, so my search has to go further afield.

Leave a Reply

*